YouTube sponsorship disclosure rules for brands

Updated

The short version

If a brand gives a YouTuber money, free products or an affiliate commission, the video has to say so clearly: US and UK regulators expect it, and YouTube requires its paid promotion setting to be ticked. The FTC says the disclosure belongs in the video itself, not only the description. The UK's ASA and CMA expect a clear "Ad" label upfront. The brand and the creator are both responsible.

Who sets the rules

Three layers apply to a sponsored YouTube video: YouTube's own policies, the advertising and consumer law of the countries involved, and whatever you and the creator agree in writing. The main sources:

YouTube
Its branded content policies cover content "influenced by a brand partner in exchange for something of value", including payment and free products. Creators must declare it with the paid promotion setting in YouTube Studio. YouTube adds that creators "and the partners you work with" are responsible for following the law.
United States
The Federal Trade Commission's Endorsement Guides, revised in 2023. The FTC's answers to common questions cover what brands must do, and its disclosure guide for social media creators covers the creator's side.
United Kingdom
The ASA enforces the advertising code, which says marketing "must be obviously identifiable as such" (CAP Code rule 2.1). The CMA enforces consumer law and has guidance for creators and for brands. The ASA's guide to making clear that ads are ads shows the labels both regulators expect.
European Union
The network of national consumer authorities has published five principles for disclosing marketing on social media. Each country's own rules and guidance apply alongside them.

What counts as a paid relationship

Money is the obvious case, but the guidance is much wider. Under the ASA's guide, any of these means the video needs a disclosure:

  • Payment for the video, a segment or a mention.
  • Free or discounted products, even when you didn't ask for a video. The ASA says it doesn't matter if there was no obligation to post. The FTC's answers make the same point: what matters is whether the free product might affect how the audience sees the review.
  • Affiliate commission on links or discount codes that pay the creator for clicks or sales.
  • Loans, trips and perks, such as a product on loan, an event invitation or a hotel stay.
  • Ongoing ties, such as being a brand ambassador, owning shares, or promoting a business the creator's family or friends own.

YouTube's policy applies "whether you receive the benefit now or later on", and covers descriptions, comments, live streams and Shorts as well as long-form videos. Sending product with no fee is covered in product seeding; it still needs disclosure.

The brand is responsible too

It's tempting to treat disclosure as the creator's job. None of the sources do:

SourceWhat it says about brands
FTC"Your company is ultimately responsible for what others do on your behalf." Brands should explain what creators can and can't say, instruct them on disclosure, check what they publish and act on problems.
CMABrands "may be held responsible" for content published on their behalf, should check it themselves, and shouldn't ignore content that isn't labelled. When sending gifts, include clear instructions that any resulting content must be labelled as an ad.
ASAThe creator, the brand and any agents involved are all responsible for making clear that content is advertising.
YouTube"You and the partners you work with are also responsible for understanding and complying with all applicable legal requirements."

What a clear disclosure looks like

  • Say it at the start. The FTC says a disclosure has the best chance of being clear if it's in the video itself, and that one at the beginning is better than one at the end. The ASA says disclosing part-way through a YouTube video isn't good enough. For an integration, disclose at the start of the sponsored segment.
  • Show it on screen as well. The FTC's rule: if the endorsement is spoken, disclose at least out loud; if it's visual, at least on screen. A video is both, so do both.
  • Tick the paid promotion box. In YouTube Studio it reads "My video contains paid promotion like a product placement, sponsorship, or endorsement". Viewers then see a label such as "Includes paid promotion". Don't rely on it alone: the CMA says to add a clear "Ad" label if a platform's tool doesn't make the advertising obvious.
  • Put it in the first lines of the description. It helps, but it doesn't replace the spoken line. The EU principles say a disclosure that needs a click on "read more" isn't adequate.
  • Name the affiliate links. The ASA says a general line that "some" links "might" earn a commission isn't enough. Say which links or products are paid.
  • In live streams, repeat it. The FTC says to repeat it periodically, so people who join late still hear it.
SourceLabels it acceptsLabels it warns against
FTC"Ad", "advertisement", "sponsored", or "Thanks to [brand] for the free product" if it's hard to miss"Sp", "spon", "collab", and "thanks" or "ambassador" on their own
ASA and CMA"Ad", "advert", "advertising", "advertisement", "advertisement feature""Sponsored", "gifted", "in partnership with", "thanks to [brand]", "affiliate", "PR"
EU consumer authorities"Advertisement", in the language of the videoAbbreviations, and "partnership", "sponsored", "collaboration", "ambassador", "gifting"

The word every source accepts is "advertisement", said in the language of the video. "Sponsored" passes in the US guidance but not in the UK or EU guidance, so avoid it if the audience is international.

What to put in your agreement

  • The disclosure itself: spoken at the start, shown on screen, in the first lines of the description, and the paid promotion box ticked. Agree the wording.
  • Honest opinions: the creator uses the product before talking about it and says what they actually think. Don't ask for praise.
  • Product claims: you supply the facts, and the creator doesn't make claims you can't back up.
  • A check before and after: you review the draft for disclosure, check the live video, and the creator fixes a missing label promptly.
  • How long it lasts: the ASA expects disclosure throughout an ongoing relationship, and in relevant content for 12 months after it ends.
  • Gifts: if you send product without a fee, a written note asking for any resulting video to be labelled as an ad.

The same points belong in your creator brief, so the person making the video sees them before filming.

How Nakodo helps

Nakodo finds creators who fit your brand, emails them on your behalf and introduces you to the ones who say yes. It doesn't write agreements or check disclosures. While a first email waits for your approval you can edit it, so you can add a line such as "We ask every partner to label videos as ads", or raise it when you agree the details after the introduction. Setting that expectation early saves an awkward conversation later. The full method is on how Nakodo works.

Questions

Do YouTubers have to disclose sponsorships?

Yes, where a brand has given them money, free products, a commission or another benefit. YouTube requires its paid promotion setting to be ticked, and the US FTC and the UK's ASA and CMA expect a clear disclosure in the video itself. The brand shares responsibility for making sure it happens.

Does a free product count as a sponsorship?

For disclosure, yes. The UK's ASA says a free product counts as payment even when there was no obligation to post, and the US FTC says a free product can affect how viewers see a review. YouTube's own policy includes free products in its definition of branded content.

Is YouTube's "Includes paid promotion" label enough?

Tick the box, but don't rely on it alone. The FTC says responsibility rests with the creator and the brand rather than the platform, and the UK's CMA says to add a clear "Ad" label if a platform's tool doesn't make the advertising obvious. A spoken disclosure at the start of the video covers the gap.

Is the brand responsible if a creator doesn't disclose?

It can be. The FTC tells companies they are ultimately responsible for what others do on their behalf, and the UK's CMA says brands may be held responsible for content published for them. Put the disclosure terms in writing, check the published video, and ask for a fix if the label is missing.

Do affiliate links need to be disclosed?

Yes. The FTC says to disclose an affiliate relationship clearly, and the UK's ASA treats links and codes that earn a commission as advertising. Under the ASA's guidance, a general line saying some links might earn a commission isn't enough: say which links or products are paid.

Is "sponsored" a good enough label?

In the US, the FTC lists "sponsored" alongside "ad" and "advertisement" as clear terms. The UK's ASA and CMA and the EU's consumer authorities advise against it and prefer "ad" or "advertisement". If your audience is international, say "advertisement" in the language of the video.

Read next